Dream Silently

…and all I loved, I loved alone.

July 17, 2007

Nothing Inparticular

quixotic

1. Caught up in the romance of noble deeds and the pursuit of unreachable goals; idealistic without regard to practicality.
2. Capricious; impulsive: “At worst his scruples must have been quixotic, not malicious” (Louis Auchincloss).

My new favorite word. It describes over half the people I’ll typically work with in a day.

I’m back in Elko now. We’ve been having some freak storms blow through, and forest fires are now surrounding us. The weather shows its suppose to be windy tomorrow. I wonder how much that’s going to affect things. I really can’t stand being in fire smoke. My allergies go crazy making it difficult to concentrate and work.

I could have stayed for another week in Denver. Well, I probably should have stayed for another week. The big guy out here for our field office though was getting a little nervous because we’re short 5 people this week. However, the projects that I was suppose to be on (3 of them) have all been postponed until unknown times. I’m going to a pre-construction meeting tomorrow for one of them. Maybe I’ll be able to dig up some things on the other two. I guess we’re waiting on a drill rig to be freed up as well for 2 small investigations. So, I’m mostly bored right now, trying to summarize a report that would of been easier to have done in Denver.

Anyways, onto the why on the last post.

It’s just something strange I’ve noticed when talking to some of our newer techs in the lab. Like, a few have been working back there for 6 months or more. I’ll ask them a question and I’ll get a blank look for an answer back for something they should, by now, know the answer too. RS inparticular will ask me questions I think she should already know the answers too. Like what an SS is (abbreviation for a Split Spoon). The other day, I was talking about the laboratory summary table with her and suggested that she needed to insert a column for the USCS (unified soils classification chart) symbol because she gives me a material description, but not its classification. She asked me what that was, which totally floored me. When a gradation and an addeburg is done in the lab, we’re primarily looking for its USCS. Why else, besides meeting specifications and standards, would we be running those particular tests?

What I’ve come to the conclusion of is that several back there just see work. They don’t take much enjoyment in the work because it’s viewed as “work”. I think if a person were to take the time to understand why they are doing something, they’d feel more purposeful because then they’d understand the reason behind what they are doing and that its important. Does that make sense?

I don’t see how anyone can stick with a job and not attempt to understand what they are doing. Memorizing and regurgitating specs and requirements is one thing, truly understanding them is another.

7 Comments »

  1. Well, yeah, if it’s something that you need to understand to do the job properly, that’s kind of a necessity. At my job I don’t understand the premise behind many of the things I do. Much of it doens’t make a bit of sense. It’s all a bunch of corporate BS. But understanding it isn’t necessary for doing it, and, frankly, I don’t care. My job isn’t interesting enough to make me care. What I do also isn’t important. What you do is and is worth understanding.

    Comment by Kim — July 18, 2007 @ 8:14 am

  2. I feel I take pride in my work and I expect the same from my supervisors. But if I am expected to remember several hundred different acronyms that the company uses, then I best look for another job. The company I’m with has an acronym for everything. I have to keep notes on them.

    Comment by B Sheep — July 18, 2007 @ 10:59 pm

  3. You are so much smarter than me! Such big words!

    love you

    joe

    Comment by joe — July 19, 2007 @ 12:48 am

  4. Very important email i just sent to you..

    joe

    Comment by joe — July 19, 2007 @ 10:00 am

  5. Although I agree with your views to a certain extent, I find it very so slightly quixotic of you to think that everybody can get a job that they like and hence take an interest in said job.
    My experience is that if the job is acceptable then they will more than likely stay if the colleagues are worth staying for, social more than business-like.

    Comment by Rick — July 20, 2007 @ 12:45 am

  6. Kim - thanks, I kind of neglected to think about the other jobs that need people, but may not be considered an important high on a scale of 1 to 10… so your point is dually noted.

    B Sheep - I would think acronyms you use all the time would be worth remembering or at least knowing what it means. That’s something I definitely don’t miss from working with the government. COB, huh? WHIP, huh? lol

    Sweetheart - You give me too much credit…

    Rick - I’ve actually been in both situations. The job I previously held I stayed in because I enjoyed my colleagues. However, now that I’m in a job I love, I’m trying to figure out what the hell I was thinking. I also do believe that if a person were to apply themselves, they can get any job/do whatever they want. Of course, I also have a habit of believing that if I can do something/have done something, then other people can too. But that’s a discussion for another time…

    Comment by lore — July 20, 2007 @ 11:20 am

  7. Testing something.

    Will this lump together to?

    Test test test

    Comment by lore — July 20, 2007 @ 11:23 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Add a Gravatar to your comment.

yummy yuck yell yay yawn wtf wow wink vodka upsidedown up tv tongue tada stress smile shock secret sad right rawr question phwoar ouch2 ouch muah mad lol lmao lightbulb left laidback hmm heart headphones grumpy grr2 grr grin glasses frown floppy film exclamation evil duh down doh dead cute cool censored confused blush blank blah biggrin aww